Plausible deniability is the ability for persons, typically senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command, to deny knowledge of, or responsibility for, any damnable actions committed by others. The objective is for the focus, in damaging revelations, to be redirected typically to subordinates in the organizational hierarchy.  Because of a lack of official evidence that would confirm high level government participation, even if 100 percent directly or indirectly, knowledgeable, or personally involved, or at least willfully ignorant of the actions, there is no official accountability.

Nixon Denies

Plausible Deniability, in a nutshell, is a clever and strategic tactic in case illegal or otherwise disreputable and unpopular activities become public.  If so, high-ranking officials may deny any awareness of such act in order to insulate themselves and thereby shift blame onto the agents who carried out the acts, and remain confident that their doubters will be unable to prove otherwise.

The lack of evidence of, in some cases, obvious involvement to the contrary, ostensibly makes the denial plausible that is, credible, although it merely makes action’s unactionable.  This is detrimental.  In truth, the term implies forethought.  The conditions set in motion are intentionally set-up to plausibly avoid responsibility for actions or knowledge past, present or future. In some organizations, legal doctrines such as command responsibility exist to hold officials or major parties responsible for the actions of subordinates involved in heinous acts.  In such cases, it nullifies any legal protection that their denial of involvement would carry.

Although plausible deniability has existed throughout history, that name for it was coined by the CIA in the early 1960s to describe the withholding of information from senior officials in order to protect them from repercussions.  This was in the event that illegal or unpopular activities by the CIA became public knowledge.  The roots of the name go back to Harry Truman’s national security council paper 10/2 of June 18, 1948.  The national security council paper defined “covert operations” as “…all activities conducted pursuant to this directive which are so planned and executed that any U.S. Government responsibility for them is not evident to unauthorized persons and that if uncovered the U.S. Government can plausibly disclaim any responsibility for them.”

[NSC 5412 was de-classified in 1977, and is located at the National Archives, RG 273.]

The term would also be reintroduced in 1975 when the Senator Frank Church, spearheaded the “Church Committee.” This was a US Senate committee who conducted an investigation into one of the highest level of secrecy and covert activities of intelligence agencies related specifically to Project MK Ultra.   In question were the covert  immoral, and unethical and criminal actions around Project MK Ultra which historically is the factual government mind control program, initiated by the CIA in the early 50’s.

Proceedings revealed that the CIA, going back to the Kennedy administration, for example, had plotted the assassination of a number of foreign leaders, including Cuba’s Fidel Castro. But the president himself, who clearly was in favor of such actions, was not to be directly involved, so that he could deny knowledge of it.

Non-attribution to the United States for covert operations was the original and principal purpose of the so-called doctrine of “plausible denial.” Evidence before the Church Committee clearly demonstrated that this concept, designed to protect the United States and its operatives from the consequences of disclosures, had been expanded to mask decisions of the president, and his senior staff members, and intelligence agency directors.

Plausible denial involves the creation of power structures such as Organized Community Stalking motivated efforts, the FBI’s InfraGard, Neighborhood Watch Programs, or Community Oriented Policing.  The objective is that victims of government targeting operations, victimized by highly advanced psycho-physical technology testing programs, and the official chains of command, both loose, and informal, can be denied if necessary for example, and even in the event of death.

Today plausible deniability includes, unified efforts, not only involving the CIA, but involvement of our Military, as well as orchestrated FBI activities, and includes, in the new paradigm, state and local law enforcement agencies, who can be given controversial instructions by powerful figures, but again, in the nature of plausible deniability, that the existence and true source of origination of those instructions, could be denied if necessary; if, the operation went disastrously wrong in covert programs, and nonconsensual human guinea pig testings efforts within unified efforts by the FBI, Military, etc., allowing the administration to disclaim, any responsibility before the public.

The fact is, “Plausible denial” is a legitimate objective for most defense teams and it is not necessarily fraudulent or immoral in this scenario.  It refers to lack of evidence proving an allegation.  In contrast, “Plausible deniability” typically is a scheme concocted before, during or after a crime, used as stated also to cleverly hide covert, official, immoral or criminal activity.  In this respect, plausible deniability becomes fraudulent when linked to a lies, corruption, and deception or worse.

In the legal literature within the US, plausible deniability has reared it ugly head in efforts related to military and law enforcement misconduct involvement targeting operations, without a doubt.  For example, typically plausible deniability allows private military contractor misuses and abuses, even arms trafficking, investment fraud, and reaches as far as medical malpractice to even internet fraud deniability.  Copyright evasion, and even sexual offenses are also included and even, more importantly, when victims seek redress, in some cases, questionable legal conduct in the courtroom itself.  This is being revealed in numerous failed Federal District Court Civil Complaints, and thousands of victims proclaiming that a high level, government backed, nonconsensual technology testing program, using US citizens essentially as lab rats is in full force and has been for a very, very long time.  Plausible deniability has been honed in government and private enterprise connected with government, down to even a basic level and on a day to day basis into an art form.  The tragedy is that today it is a phrase that equates and defines, lack of accountability for horrific wrongs, and extreme violations of the Constitutional, Civil and even very basic Human Rights of United States citizens being used as lab rats.

As the Church Committee Hearing’s progressed, Senator Church would declare, long before Edward Snowden, who was likely in diapers at the time:

“The National Security Agency’s capability at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide. If a dictator ever took over, the N.S.A. could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back.” ― Frank Church

Prophetic are his words today.

Senator Church Warning:

Influential Senator Warned in 1975: “Th[e National Security Agency’s] Capability At Any Time Could Be Turned Around On The American People, And No American Would Have Any Privacy Left …There Would Be No Place To Hide. [If A Dictator Ever Took Over, The N.S.A.] Could Enable It To Impose Total Tyranny, And There Would Be No Way To Fight Back”

However, full disclosure of the inner workings of the NSA and the use of highly advanced, psychological electronic, electromagnetic frequency, mind invasive technology  would not be fully disclosed nor precise information detailing the magnitude of the highly advanced psychological electronic (Psychotronic) covert operations, specifically related to high tech technological targeting operations until an individual named John St. Clair Akwei.  John St. Clair Akwei, would become one of the first to make the connection with covert technological targeted victimization through the use of psycho-physical technology and also his effort is just one of a long list of the first official lawsuits bought against powerful agencies by an average citizen the NSA itself.  Typically his case, as well as numerous other cases, before and after, have all been dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction with an overtone, some would argue of plausible deniability.  This includes  those brought by seasoned and skilled attorneys of the ACLU and Electronic Frontier Foundation.

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court’s role in Electronic Surveillance and Targeted Individuals.  Within the link it reads related to how the targeting can begin saying:

“For example, certain characteristics like ethnicity and religion combined with probable can cause the FBI to dig into the background of an individual until anything remotely suspicious comes up, even if there’s clear-cut evidence that the person is innocent…”

John St. Clair Akwei vs. NSA, Ft. Meade, MD, USA

Pivotal to John St. Clair Akwei’s lawsuit was the revelation that a deeper level of the NSA’s activities were underway.  His lawsuit revealed the agency’s Mission & Operations, Communications Intelligence, Signals Intelligence, Domestic Intelligence, and efforts defined as Independently Operated Personnel Target Citizens (aka Organized Community Stalking for example).  It revealed the NSA’s Domestic Electronic Surveillance Network using Signals Intelligence aka biometrics today, Remote Computer Tampering, Detecting electromagnetic frequency (EMF) fields, used in Humans for Surveillance, NSA Signals Intelligence Use of EMF Brain Stimulation (manipulation and influence to include subliminal) and also Capabilities of NSA operatives and Remote Neural Monitoring, a term credited to John St. Clair Akwei.  The lawsuit was an eye opener in regards to detailing the NSA’s Signals Intelligence Electronic Brain Link Technology and much more for the first time in detail, and presented before a Court then, later made available to the public as a pdf.

Electromagnetic Frequency Mind Control Weapons – Weapons from Hell


Link to Akwei’s Lawsuit:

Edward Snowden would later reveal a highly classified and covert operation, decades in the making, and continued and ongoing research, TESTING, and development programs unsuccessful unless requiring human guinea pigs.

It must be understood, in awareness, that the media is owned, operated, and controlled, by  a global cabal.  Anything revealed publicly is intentional and exactly what the cabal wants publicized no matter who the messenger.  In the case of Snowden’s revelation, of thought  technology, it is factually patented at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 

10 Mind-Reading Tech Projects That Might Freak You Out:


The unethical and immoral problem is that thousands of thoughts pass through the human mind around the clock as the human mind acts as a filter of fruitless thought.  Most thoughts are transitory and are not conclusions a person has formulated as true, accurate or correct, but information the human mind uses.  The mind invasive efforts today, with the average joe sitting at highly advanced computer systems, focus on exploiting passing thought, in most cases, harmless, while looking for anything useful to exploit, as the thought police, however without the ability or consistency to unify the full spectrum of thought passing through a person’s head or connecting surrounding circumstances and experiences.  The fact is thought control is factually mind control.  If you can control a person’s thoughts then you control them.

Energy Weapon beam
Reported Directed Energy Weapon Attacks in Covert “slow kill” Operations

How “The Program” is being applied today in, covert, government backed, mobilized Organized Community Stalking efforts using covert victimizations and reported “Slow Kill” technology is being used around victims placed into this program.  The end result is:


Based on the above description, and objective end result, obviously there is a lot to DENY, as well as an ongoing hope to cover-up heinous covert operations involving  factual, horrific, bogus operations, which essentially is a massive official human guinea pig technology testing program that has been approved for military and law enforcement testing purposes in its entirety.

See “Technology Approval” in website link below.

Mind Control poster

A strategic effort to keep what is happening well hidden from the public in general, specifically related to the heinous, covert, physical torture technology in use, provided to recruits, connected at all levels today, FBI, DHS, state and local police is pivotal.  The use of technology resulting in the creation of grave illness, and monstrous electromagnetic psycho-physical manipulation and influence is operating literally under the radar and hidden under layers of cover-ups.

For example, today as many victims sit inside what should be, and once was, a moral 4th Amendment constitutional right to privacy inside the safety of private dwelling, their home, efforts can be initiated, approved by government, with ultimately result with one goal in mind. The sheer fact of individuals reporting victimization, around the clock, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week have in many cases resulted in a herd mentality and determination that anyone is covertly expendable. Organized stalking  efforts are pivotal in around the clock dynamic of high tech victimization, as well as a vital necessity for  recruitment of the community and neighbors around victims, and cleverly, for emotional trauma revealed with such organized and highly level involvement and motivation.

As a result,  a victim can be covertly murdered inside their home by the community recruitment team, and strategically, typical of plausible deniability, there is no official accountability for the agency spearheading the effort, and of whom provided the technology, looked the other way, or operative set-up inside homes nearby, for pay, or even the accuracy of drones many victims report parked over homes and assisting and partaking in the overall effort with energy weapons as well.  It is a known fact that 30,000 drones have been approved by Congress for US Skies and the effort is well underway.

What comes to mind, without a doubt, in the numerous and many cases reporting organized community high tech victimization, covert and extremely and in some cases, deadly Directed Energy Weapon attacks, by numerous victim experiences, nationwide, and globally, is 100% the use of the dynamic and hopeful effectiveness of “Plausible Deniability” to redirect focus away from the official mobilizing program, and redirected to community based subordinates who would never admit involvement and likely the vicim accused of delusions instead as another form of Psy Ops.

The truth is, in reality, it is not about the community at all, but is and should be about, an accurate focus on the high level motivating source that is essentially approving the use of anyone while hoping to remain in the background.

Cleverly, plausible deniability has reared it ugly head in useful, deadly community efforts around many victims.  If by chance, a covertly targeted victim drops dead inside their home, who would be accountable?  And, those spearheading the effort, more importantly, appear to know, likely from experience and destruction of many lives, covertly, know it cannot be proven or is difficult too.

The fact is, in my case, and that of many is that the LAPD / FBI / USAF or the “militarized police state” targeting individuals today labeled as “Domestic Terrorist” is also a twisted form of plausible deniability in and of itself.  Activist, whistleblowers,  and ongoing monitoring and energy weapon technology has become the weapons of choice today as well as tracking everything a victim does from state-of-the-art operation centers.  And in the sense of whistleblowers, for obvious reasons, specific agencies if involved in covert criminal activity resulting in death, obviously would have a vested interest in silencing anyone exposing them.   In fact, on a personal level, I have been factually ridiculed, “You can’t prove a thing” in the background of my phone line or as I continue to report specifically, from the satellite viewing entry point in my ceiling where I am monitored inside my residence as well as tracked outside of it.   The fact is, if there was even a fighting chance that it could be proven, I and many others would likely 100% come up against Plausible Deniability.  In fact, this dynamic, is also useful in assuring that human lab rate testing effort continue undisturbed.

One must admit, how convenient and clever Plausible Deniability becomes for rogue government operatives, given approval from higher authority.  Another form of plausible deniability is the fact that the deadly technology in use is strategically labeled as non-lethal, which is again is a plausible denial of its full potential in and of itself and 100% an intentional misnomer.  Depending on how the technology is used, which is available as portable, handheld, land, sea, drone and space based systems, and typically again, used in 24 hour a day, 7 days a week covert physical torture victimization targeting, it becomes deadly and a covert, deniable highly effective, synthetic method, through intentional use, as a hope to silence the victim with the capability to create aneurysms, cancer, even blindness when the eyes are briefly focused on intermittently.  The program is the slow, and gradual deterioration affect little by little.  Damage of organs and tissue in “slow kill” operations becomes highly effective in operations, “Covert Technological Murder – Big Brother Approved.”  Understand that what is happening today is no longer reserved for covert activities of the NSA, CIA, etc.

CIA Torture Report Shows the Rogue Elephants are Back

Many are reporting how covert grave illness, to include heart attacks are striking down, real patriots, who love the USA or covertly stricken.

Case and point…

Whistleblower, Dr. Katherine Albrecht contracted cancer, and the possibility that it may have been the result of her being unwittingly targeted by covert directed energy weapons, and as punishment for the work she has done in exposing the RFID industry for its Orwellian agenda social mad population control of individuals, groups and large population; as well as the fact that implanted RFID chips do cause cancer.  Ask yourself would high level testing operations want it known or publicized?

Dr. Karen Albrecht Activism


“If I am correct about this is correct” writes James Marina, another victim, The Mother Of All Black Ops, “Dr. Albrecht may still be in danger, even if she is fortunate enough to experience a remission from her cancer, because a directed energy weapon can be used to cause the cancer to reoccur, or for new cancers to develop within her body.

He further states:

“Moreover, having already been diagnosed and treated for cancer, affords those who would have given her the cancer through their use of directed energy weapons, plausible deniability in targeting Dr. Albrecht with a directed energy weapon again in the future.

This is the insidious nature of this electronic warfare technology, since it can be used against any American citizen (through a covertly implemented national signals intelligence EMF brain mapping program in the United States, & the NSA’s Signals Intelligence EMF Scanning Network – which when used in conjunction with this brain mapping program is used to instantly identify the unique brain map of any American citizen) by being deployed via the EMF spectrum, while giving the incarnated evil who use these weapons against us, anonymity in committing these horrendous crimes, as they hide behind the cover of the federal organization they work for.

According to testimony taken from an FBI agent in a lawsuit filed by a man named Jesus Mendoza, who (along with his family) has been the target of directed energy weapon’s attacks for years by the FBI, the FBI was given access to directed energy weapons by the U.S. Justice Department in 1994, and has since been using them as a means in which to both torture and murder American citizens with plausible deniability.

Is Dr. Katherine Albrecht Being Targeted For A Directed Energy Induced Murder? And Was The Breast Cancer She Developed The Result Of A Directed Energy Weapon Attack On Her Person?

There have been so many American citizens (oftentimes in highly visible roles) murdered by way of directed energy weaponry, whose deaths were reported to have been from natural causes, that this author (James Marino) wonders if the U.S. federal government now uses directed energy weaponry as the de facto standard for murdering anyone whom the leadership in this government takes a disliking to, yet, cannot prosecute through the legal system.

I find it of interest that activist, Judi Bari, developed breast cancer while she was in the process of suing the FBI, and died before she could see her lawsuit to fruition (Bari’s friends and family proceeded with the suit after her death and were awarded a $4.4 million judgment against the FBI – whether the FBI was ever forced to actually pay this judgment remains to be seen).” writes Marino.”

In my case, appearing to come from many directions, and at times feeling as if a portable beam is originating from nearby locations, there is an instant, and intense, burning sensation that is periodically focused on my breast as well then bounces around my body delivering microwave non-ionizing radiation with repeated attacks.

I find it unbelievable that rogue operatives, and those they brainwash into involvement, who must be chipped or definitely programmed, as operatives, are so damaged mentally, that they actually believe themselves important when given permission to destroy lives, and are employed in these specific positions where the goal is to insure cover-up of the horrors and global destruction created by those who truthfully really don’t give a darn about them either.  Has the light gone out in there brains?





plausible deniability

Who will be held accountable for the 100%, strategic, deterioration of my left hip joint, while the operation watched me finalizing the first book in my book series, requests that I stop, and the belief that slow, steady deterioration of my health can ever be proven or labeled, in disbelief of the truth as having another motivating source.

Who will be responsible for the renewed, around the clock focus, now on the right hip and other areas of my body as the deadly energy weapon beam travels from my head to toe, around the clock, combined with ongoing threats, degrading names, etc., designed typically to push a victim to suicide or into lashing out while, “Stop what you are doing and we will leave you alone” is said?  Will it be recruited subordinates in operations which typically hit a victim from many directions?

The answer – Plausible Deniability.

The fact is no one, I repeat, no one, once placed in “The Program” has ever been released unless on numerous death beds and the real culprit unaccountable strategically.

Active Denial Beam from Across the Street

Covert Technological Murder Update

If a lot of people are saying the same thing, LISTEN UP!

Slow Kill


The U.S. National Security Act of 1947, the Origin of “Plausible Deniability” and the Assassination of JFK: